Most AI projects do not fail on the model. They stall between a convincing demo and a system that survives real users, real cost and a real auditor. This is the path LMXAI runs.
The AI prototype-to-production journey is the work that turns a notebook, a Copilot trial or a hackathon agent into a service with an SLO, an owner, a cost envelope and an evidence pack. LMXAI exists for that interval. The homepage claim is literal: one partner across software, architecture, data and commercialisation, acting as fractional AI CTO.
| Stage | Exit criterion |
|---|---|
| Frame | Intended purpose, users, data classes, success metric written down |
| Thin slice | One workflow in a real environment, not a slide prototype |
| Retrieve / tool | Index or tools you own; eval set of ≥30 gold items |
| Serve | vLLM or contracted API behind a gateway; traces on |
| Harden | Auth, egress policy, PII handling, human override |
| Prove | SLO + cost sheet + AI Act gap list signed by an owner |
| Transfer | Your org, your runbooks, your on-call — we stay or we leave cleanly |
EU-specific: stage “Prove” includes the compliance deliverable — classification, logging, technical-file skeleton — so production and regulation do not become two projects that never meet.
A honest thin slice is weeks, not quarters. A workspace or clinical agent that a 500-person org can use is months, because retrieval quality, IAM and works-council constraints dominate the calendar — not model choice. Anyone who quotes a production date from a model card is selling the skipped journey.
Related reading: production RAG and agents, sovereign vLLM, workspace vs Copilot.
Next step. If this is the decision in front of you, LMXAI will scope the system — not a workshop series.